Ethics study case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Ethics study case - Essay ExampleThe case illustrates two relevant facts into principle of beneficence the employers act not to remove or cover the asbestos rich cables threatens harm on the employees lives while an act of whistle blowing threatens the governings corporate image and legal liability. Confidentiality is another applicable principle to the case and defines the liability to maintain privacy of a person or creative activitys sensitive information and whistle blowing puts the principle at stake. Lawfulness, another applicable ethical principle, defines the knowledge of laws and their implementation and applies to the makeup that should be aware of and extend health and safety laws and yet ignores the rules. The organizations failure to remove or cover asbestos pipes is wrong because it contravenes principles of beneficence and lawfulness. The conflict is prioritization of the interest to safeguard the job, employees lives, and the organization and it affects the dep artments employees at individual level, their families and the society at group level, and also the organization (Pfeiffer and Forsberg 15- 19). Options in resolving the problem from different ethical perspectives Utilitarianism defines ethical motive from an acts consequence. ... re to asbestos, effects of the diseases on the employees such as death and incapacitation, and consequences on families and the society would however be more harmful than the phoners financial loss in lawsuits and from poor corporate image. This is because loss of lives or body parts is more significant than financial losses that the political party may incur. This justifies ethics in whistle bowing. The scope of deontology ethics that is based on rules and obligations also justifies whistle blowing that is supported by established laws on health and safety at the work place. This is because the organization has decided to operate contrary to the rules that establish its duty to ensure a safe work enviro nment. The general obligation to ensure safety of other members of the society also justifies whistle blowing in the case. Virtue ethics, with its basis on character such as respect of massess lives and welfare and integrity also identifies whistle blowing as the solution towards protecting the employees lives by justifying an employees integrity and strong personality in heave the red flag (Brooks and Dunn 182- 188). My perceived solution My perceived solution to the case is to expose the condition to relevant agencies for appropriate measures. This would involve a formal colloquy to the organizations management of intentions to seek external interventions towards protecting employees welfare. I would then write to both the State Department of Health and the Environmental egis Agency to inform them of the asbestos exposure at the workplace and the organizations position against removing or covering the asbestos cables. I would then submit a reduplicate of each letter to the or ganizations management before remittance to the agencies. The proposed